DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Perodua Kelisa vs 2002 ZAZ 1103 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeZAZ
KelisaModel1103
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h15,6 s
140 km/hTop speed154 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
56 HPPower63 HP
88 NmTorque101 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank38 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R12Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3480 mmLength3980 mm
1490 mmWidth1564 mm
1425 mmHeight1425 mm
775 KgWeight790 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Perodua Kelisa and 2002 ZAZ 1103 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…