DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 ZAZ 1103 vs 2002 Perodua Kelisa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakePerodua
1103ModelKelisa
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,6 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
154 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement989 cc
63 HPPower56 HP
101 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3980 mmLength3480 mm
1564 mmWidth1490 mm
1425 mmHeight1425 mm
790 KgWeight775 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 ZAZ 1103 and 2002 Perodua Kelisa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…