DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 ZAZ 1103 vs 2000 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Kangoo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeRenault
1103ModelKangoo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
153 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1254 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
60 HPPower75 HP
94 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3980 mmLength3995 mm
1564 mmWidth1663 mm
1410 mmHeight1827 mm
790 KgWeight1065 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 ZAZ 1103 and 2000 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…