DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Kangoo vs 2000 ZAZ 1103 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Kangoo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeZAZ
KangooModel1103
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
148 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1254 cc
75 HPPower60 HP
105 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank38 lt
9 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14 TTyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength3980 mm
1663 mmWidth1564 mm
1827 mmHeight1410 mm
1065 KgWeight790 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Kangoo and 2000 ZAZ 1103 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…