E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 ZAZ 1102 vs 2000 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
ZAZMakeOpel
1102ModelCombo
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats2
3Doors3

Performance

ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
148 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1091 ccEngine displacement1195 cc
53 HPPower45 HP
80 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank0 lt
6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/70 R13STyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
3708 mmLength4230 mm
1554 mmWidth1686 mm
1410 mmHeight1805 mm
727 KgWeight1065 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 ZAZ 1102 and 2000 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVSImage unavailableZAZ 1102 vs ZAZ 11022000 and 1999 model years2000 Suzuki CultusVSImage unavailableSuzuki Cultus vs ZAZ 11022000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableZAZ 1125 vs ZAZ 11022000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableZAZ 1140 vs ZAZ 11022000 and 1999 model years2000 Chevrolet MetroVSImage unavailableChevrolet Metro vs ZAZ 11022000 and 1999 model years

Comments are loading…