DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Metro vs 1999 ZAZ 1102 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeZAZ
MetroModel1102
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

145 km/hTop speed148 km/h
993 ccEngine displacement1091 cc
56 HPPower53 HP
78 NmTorque80 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank39 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13Tyre size155/70 R13S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3790 mmLength3708 mm
1590 mmWidth1554 mm
1390 mmHeight1410 mm
860 KgWeight727 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Metro and 1999 ZAZ 1102 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…