DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 ZAZ 1102 vs 2000 ZAZ 1140 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1140

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 1102SpecificationZAZ 1140
ZAZMakeZAZ
1102Model1140
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

ZAZ 1102SpecificationZAZ 1140
148 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1091 ccEngine displacement993 cc
53 HPPower54 HP
80 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 1102SpecificationZAZ 1140
PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank39 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 1102SpecificationZAZ 1140
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13STyre size155/70 R13S
YesABS—

Dimensions

ZAZ 1102SpecificationZAZ 1140
3708 mmLength3708 mm
1554 mmWidth1554 mm
1410 mmHeight1410 mm
727 KgWeight727 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 ZAZ 1102 and 2000 ZAZ 1140 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1140 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…