DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 ZAZ 1140 vs 1998 ZAZ 1102 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1140

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 1140SpecificationZAZ 1102
ZAZMakeZAZ
1140Model1102
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

ZAZ 1140SpecificationZAZ 1102
148 km/hTop speed148 km/h
993 ccEngine displacement1091 cc
54 HPPower53 HP
0 NmTorque80 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 1140SpecificationZAZ 1102
PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank39 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 1140SpecificationZAZ 1102
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13STyre size155/70 R13S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

ZAZ 1140SpecificationZAZ 1102
3708 mmLength3708 mm
1554 mmWidth1554 mm
1410 mmHeight1410 mm
727 KgWeight727 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 ZAZ 1140 and 1998 ZAZ 1102 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1140 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…