DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Zastava Yugo vs 2004 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeSmart
YugoModelFortwo
2008Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
3Doors3

Performance

20,1 s0–100 km/h19,8 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
903 ccEngine displacement799 cc
45 HPPower41 HP
63 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank33 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption4,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
135/85 R13Tyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3490 mmLength2500 mm
1540 mmWidth1515 mm
1340 mmHeight1549 mm
750 KgWeight805 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Zastava Yugo and 2004 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…