DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Fortwo vs 2008 Zastava Yugo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeZastava
FortwoModelYugo
2004Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h20,1 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
799 ccEngine displacement903 cc
41 HPPower45 HP
100 NmTorque63 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank32 lt
4,5 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size135/85 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3490 mm
1515 mmWidth1540 mm
1549 mmHeight1340 mm
805 KgWeight750 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2150 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Fortwo and 2008 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…