DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Zastava 128 Skala vs 2000 ZAZ 1103 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1103

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeZAZ
128 SkalaModel1103
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

20,0 s0–100 km/h17,4 s
135 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1116 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
54 HPPower58 HP
78 NmTorque90 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank38 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3840 mmLength3980 mm
1590 mmWidth1564 mm
1350 mmHeight1425 mm
830 KgWeight790 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Zastava 128 Skala and 2000 ZAZ 1103 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1103 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…