DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 ZAZ 1103 vs 1995 Zastava 128 Skala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1103

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeZastava
1103Model128 Skala
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,4 s0–100 km/h20,0 s
147 km/hTop speed135 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1116 cc
58 HPPower54 HP
90 NmTorque78 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank36 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size145/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3980 mmLength3840 mm
1564 mmWidth1590 mm
1425 mmHeight1350 mm
790 KgWeight830 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 ZAZ 1103 and 1995 Zastava 128 Skala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1103 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…