1990 • Alfa Romeo
164
Alfa Romeo 164 2.5 TD (164.A1A) 1990Overall Score58.5/100
1990 Alfa Romeo 164 vs 1990 Ford Taurus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 2.5 (89 Hp) 1990Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 164
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationFord Taurus
Alfa RomeoMakeFord
164ModelTaurus
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationFord Taurus
10,8 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
117 HPPower89 HP
258 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationFord Taurus
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationFord Taurus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R 15Tyre size205/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 164SpecificationFord Taurus
4550 mmLength4874 mm
1760 mmWidth1796 mm
1400 mmHeight1402 mm
1320 KgWeight1386 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2692 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Alfa Romeo 164 and 1990 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 164 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…