DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Ford Taurus vs 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 164

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAlfa Romeo
TaurusModel164
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
89 HPPower117 HP
176 NmTorque258 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R 15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4874 mmLength4550 mm
1796 mmWidth1760 mm
1402 mmHeight1400 mm
1386 KgWeight1320 Kg
2692 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Ford Taurus and 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 164 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…