DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo XC90 vs 2011 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XF
VolvoMakeJaguar
XC90ModelXF
2010Model year2011
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XF
9,3 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
190 km/hTop speed237 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
238 HPPower238 HP
320 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption15,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
12,0 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XF
4798 mmLength4961 mm
1898 mmWidth1877 mm
1743 mmHeight1460 mm
—Weight1690 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo XC90 and 2011 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…