DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jaguar XF vs 2010 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo XC90
JaguarMakeVolvo
XFModelXC90
2011Model year2010
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo XC90
8,3 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
237 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
238 HPPower238 HP
0 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,5 ltAverage consumption12,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo XC90
4961 mmLength4798 mm
1877 mmWidth1898 mm
1460 mmHeight1743 mm
1690 KgWeight—
2909 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jaguar XF and 2010 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…