2006 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.9 T6 (272 Hp) 2006Overall Score78.75/100
2006 Volvo XC90 vs 2009 Jaguar XJ Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Jaguar
XJ
Jaguar XJ 3.0 V6 D (275 Hp) 2009Overall Score79.25/100
WINNER
Jaguar XJ
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XJ
VolvoMakeJaguar
XC90ModelXJ
2006Model year2009
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XJ
9,3 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
272 HPPower275 HP
380 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank82 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC90SpecificationJaguar XJ
4800 mmLength—
1890 mmWidth—
1740 mmHeight—
2100 KgWeight—
2860 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Volvo XC90 and 2009 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailablePorsche Boxster vs Volvo XC902006 and 2006 model years
VSImage unavailableCitroen C5 vs Volvo XC902006 and 2006 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo S80 vs Volvo XC902004 and 2006 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Chairman vs Volvo XC902006 and 2006 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableJaguar XJ vs Volvo XC902009 and 2006 model yearsComments are loading…