2009 • Jaguar
XJ
Jaguar XJ 3.0 V6 D (275 Hp) 2009Overall Score79.25/100
2009 Jaguar XJ vs 2006 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.9 T6 (272 Hp) 2006Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Jaguar XJ
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
JaguarMakeVolvo
XJModelXC90
2009Model year2006
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
6,4 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
275 HPPower272 HP
0 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
—Length4800 mm
—Width1890 mm
—Height1740 mm
—Weight2100 Kg
—Wheelbase2860 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Jaguar XJ and 2006 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableToyota Crown vs Jaguar XJ2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Discovery vs Jaguar XJ2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Range Rover Sport vs Jaguar XJ2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo 159 vs Jaguar XJ2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo Brera vs Jaguar XJ2009 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…