DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationAlpina B3
VolvoMakeAlpina
XC90ModelB3
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationAlpina B3
9,3 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
210 km/hTop speed266 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
272 HPPower280 HP
380 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank63 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationAlpina B3
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
235/60 R18Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationAlpina B3
4800 mmLength4471 mm
1890 mmWidth1739 mm
1740 mmHeight1395 mm
2100 KgWeight1450 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…