2004 • Alpina
B10
Alpina B10 3.3 i 24V (280 Hp) 2004Overall Score79.5/100
2004 Alpina B10 vs 2005 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.9 T6 (272 Hp) 2005Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Alpina B10
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina B10SpecificationVolvo XC90
AlpinaMakeVolvo
B10ModelXC90
2004Model year2005
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Alpina B10SpecificationVolvo XC90
6,7 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
256 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3300 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
280 HPPower272 HP
335 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina B10SpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina B10SpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina B10SpecificationVolvo XC90
4805 mmLength4800 mm
1800 mmWidth1890 mm
1420 mmHeight1740 mm
1640 KgWeight2100 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2860 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Alpina B10 and 2005 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…