DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Alpina B10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeAlpina
XC90ModelB10
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
210 km/hTop speed256 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
272 HPPower280 HP
380 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/60 R18Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4805 mm
1890 mmWidth1800 mm
1740 mmHeight1420 mm
2100 KgWeight1640 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…