DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC90 vs 2003 Nissan Gloria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Gloria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
XC90ModelGloria
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
272 HPPower240 HP
380 NmTorque309 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/60 R18Tyre size215/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4865 mm
1890 mmWidth1770 mm
1740 mmHeight1440 mm
2100 KgWeight1600 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC90 and 2003 Nissan Gloria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Gloria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…