DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar XJ vs 2003 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
JaguarMakeVolvo
XJModelXC90
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
8,1 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
233 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
238 HPPower272 HP
293 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
235/45 R17Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationVolvo XC90
5090 mmLength4800 mm
1860 mmWidth1890 mm
1448 mmHeight1740 mm
1545 KgWeight2100 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar XJ and 2003 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…