DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
XC90Model156
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2783 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
272 HPPower250 HP
380 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank63 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
235/65 R17Tyre size225/45 ZR 17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4430 mm
1890 mmWidth1745 mm
1740 mmHeight1415 mm
2100 KgWeight1410 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…