DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW Z3 vs 2005 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo XC90
BMWMakeVolvo
Z3ModelXC90
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeEstate
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo XC90
6,0 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2783 cc
231 HPPower272 HP
300 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/50 R16Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo XC90
4025 mmLength4800 mm
1740 mmWidth1890 mm
1306 mmHeight1740 mm
1305 KgWeight2100 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW Z3 and 2005 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…