DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo XC90 vs 2005 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJaguar
XC90ModelS-type
2004Model year2005
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
210 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2783 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
272 HPPower238 HP
380 NmTorque293 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank68 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption16,5 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size225/55 R16 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4861 mm
1890 mmWidth1819 mm
1740 mmHeight1441 mm
2100 KgWeight1705 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo XC90 and 2005 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…