DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar S-type vs 2004 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
S-typeModelXC90
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
233 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2783 cc
238 HPPower272 HP
293 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank72 lt
16,5 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/55 R16 WTyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4800 mm
1819 mmWidth1890 mm
1441 mmHeight1740 mm
1705 KgWeight2100 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar S-type and 2004 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…