DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo XC90 vs 1999 Acura NSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura NSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

75.75–76.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationAcura NSX
VolvoMakeAcura
XC90ModelNSX
2002Model year1999
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationAcura NSX
9,3 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
210 km/hTop speed270 km/h
2783 ccEngine displacement2977 cc
272 HPPower274 HP
380 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationAcura NSX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption—
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationAcura NSX
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationAcura NSX
4800 mmLength4425 mm
1890 mmWidth1810 mm
1740 mmHeight1175 mm
2100 KgWeight1370 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo XC90 and 1999 Acura NSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura NSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…