DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Porsche Boxster vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Porsche Boxster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

76.25–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PorscheMakeVolvo
BoxsterModelXC90
2004Model year2002
CoupeBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
260 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3179 ccEngine displacement2783 cc
280 HPPower272 HP
0 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank72 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/55 R17; 235/50 R17Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4329 mmLength4800 mm
1801 mmWidth1890 mm
1295 mmHeight1740 mm
1385 KgWeight2100 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Porsche Boxster and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Porsche Boxster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…