DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC90 vs 2003 BMW Z4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
VolvoMakeBMW
XC90ModelZ4
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
9,9 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
210 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
210 HPPower192 HP
320 NmTorque245 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank55 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/70 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW Z4
4800 mmLength4091 mm
1890 mmWidth1781 mm
1740 mmHeight1299 mm
1985 KgWeight1335 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2495 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC90 and 2003 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…