2003 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.5i (192 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.5/100
2003 BMW X3 vs 2003 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.5 20V (210 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Volvo XC90
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC90
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelXC90
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC90
8,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
208 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower210 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC90
4569 mmLength4800 mm
1853 mmWidth1890 mm
1674 mmHeight1740 mm
1815 KgWeight1985 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2860 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 BMW X3 and 2003 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…