DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC90 vs 2003 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW X3
VolvoMakeBMW
XC90ModelX3
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW X3
9,9 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
210 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
210 HPPower192 HP
320 NmTorque245 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank67 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption15,6 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW X3
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/70 R16Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationBMW X3
4800 mmLength4569 mm
1890 mmWidth1853 mm
1740 mmHeight1674 mm
1985 KgWeight1815 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC90 and 2003 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…