DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2013 Subaru Outback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSubaru
XC90ModelOutback
2012Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
163 HPPower173 HP
340 NmTorque235 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears—
—Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4790 mm
1936 mmWidth1820 mm
1743 mmHeight1605 mm
—Weight1533 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2013 Subaru Outback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…