DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Subaru Forester vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeVolvo
ForesterModelXC90
2012Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
196 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
175 HPPower163 HP
235 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
225/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4595 mmLength4807 mm
1795 mmWidth1936 mm
1735 mmHeight1743 mm
1513 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Subaru Forester and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…