DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSubaru
XC90ModelForester
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCrossover
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
163 HPPower175 HP
340 NmTorque235 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears—
—Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4595 mm
1936 mmWidth1795 mm
1743 mmHeight1735 mm
—Weight1513 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2012 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…