DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volvo XC90 vs 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Eclipse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
XC90ModelEclipse
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
163 HPPower162 HP
340 NmTorque217 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength—
1936 mmWidth—
1784 mmHeight—
2141 KgWeight—
2857 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volvo XC90 and 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Eclipse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…