DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2006 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Eclipse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
EclipseModelXC90
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2378 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
162 HPPower163 HP
217 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4807 mm
—Width1936 mm
—Height1784 mm
—Weight2141 Kg
—Wheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse and 2006 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Eclipse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…