2004 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.4 D3 (163 Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
2004 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.4i (170 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo V50
VolvoMakeVolvo
XC90ModelV50
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo V50
11,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
163 HPPower170 HP
340 NmTorque230 Nm
5Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo V50
4807 mmLength4522 mm
1936 mmWidth1845 mm
1784 mmHeight1457 mm
2141 KgWeight1483 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableVolvo V50 vs Volvo XC902004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo S40 vs Volvo XC902004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo S80 vs Volvo XC902004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableChrysler Grand Voyager vs Volvo XC902004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableChrysler Voyager vs Volvo XC902004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…