DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo S40 vs 2004 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationVolvo XC90
VolvoMakeVolvo
S40ModelXC90
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationVolvo XC90
10,6 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
140 HPPower163 HP
220 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16 VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationVolvo XC90
4476 mmLength4807 mm
1770 mmWidth1936 mm
1454 mmHeight1784 mm
1400 KgWeight2141 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo S40 and 2004 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…