DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC90 vs 2003 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeKia
XC90ModelOptima
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
163 HPPower140 HP
340 NmTorque199 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4719 mm
1936 mmWidth1815 mm
1784 mmHeight1410 mm
2141 KgWeight1488 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC90 and 2003 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…