DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelXC90
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
140 HPPower163 HP
199 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4719 mmLength4807 mm
1815 mmWidth1936 mm
1410 mmHeight1784 mm
1488 KgWeight2141 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…