DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC90 vs 2016 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Golf

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
XC90ModelGolf
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
225 HPPower230 HP
470 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8 AutomaticGears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4268 mm
1923 mmWidth1799 mm
1776 mmHeight1442 mm
2078 KgWeight1382 Kg
2984 mmWheelbase2631 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC90 and 2016 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…