DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Superb vs 2016 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Superb

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolvo
SuperbModelXC90
2016Model year2016
LiftbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

5,8 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
250 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
220 HPPower225 HP
350 NmTorque470 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank71 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6 DSGGears8 Automatic
215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4950 mm
1864 mmWidth1923 mm
1468 mmHeight1776 mm
1550 KgWeight2078 Kg
2841 mmWheelbase2984 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Superb and 2016 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…