DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC90 vs 2016 Toyota GT 86 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeToyota
XC90ModelGT 86
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
220 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
225 HPPower200 HP
470 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 AutomaticGears6
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4240 mm
1923 mmWidth1775 mm
1776 mmHeight1285 mm
2078 KgWeight1265 kg
—Luggage capacity218 lt
2984 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Volvo XC90

No additional feature records are available.

Toyota GT 86Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC90 and 2016 Toyota GT 86 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…