DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC70 vs 2003 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCadillac
XC70ModelCTS
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
225 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2597 cc
210 HPPower181 HP
320 NmTorque245 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4733 mmLength4828 mm
1860 mmWidth1795 mm
1562 mmHeight1441 mm
1742 KgWeight1625 Kg
2763 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC70 and 2003 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…