2003 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.5i (192 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.5/100
2003 BMW X3 vs 2003 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.5 T (210 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Volvo XC70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelXC70
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
8,9 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
208 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower210 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
4569 mmLength4733 mm
1853 mmWidth1860 mm
1674 mmHeight1562 mm
1815 KgWeight1742 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2763 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 BMW X3 and 2003 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…