2004 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.4 T (200Hp) 2004Overall Score68.5/100
2004 Volvo XC70 vs 2004 Saab 9-2X Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Saab
9-2X
Saab 9-2X 2.5i 16V (173 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Saab 9-2X
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
VolvoMakeSaab
XC70Model9-2X
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo XC70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
8,6 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
200 HPPower173 HP
285 NmTorque225 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC70SpecificationSaab 9-2X
4733 mmLength4460 mm
1860 mmWidth1695 mm
1562 mmHeight1465 mm
1630 KgWeight1395 Kg
2763 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo XC70 and 2004 Saab 9-2X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-2X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableVolkswagen Passat vs Volvo XC702004 and 2004 model yearsVSImage unavailableSaab 9-2X vs Volvo XC702004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo 156 vs Volvo XC702004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo 166 vs Volvo XC702004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableLancia Thesis vs Volvo XC702004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…