2004 • Saab
9-2X
Saab 9-2X 2.5i 16V (173 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.25/100
2004 Saab 9-2X vs 2004 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.4 T (200Hp) 2004Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-2X
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo XC70
SaabMakeVolvo
9-2XModelXC70
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo XC70
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
196 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
173 HPPower200 HP
225 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo XC70
4460 mmLength4733 mm
1695 mmWidth1860 mm
1465 mmHeight1562 mm
1395 KgWeight1630 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2763 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Saab 9-2X and 2004 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-2X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…