DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC70 vs 2016 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
XC70ModelCaptiva
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
163 HPPower184 HP
420 NmTorque400 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption10 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4673 mm
1870 mmWidth1849 mm
1604 mmHeight1756 mm
2815 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC70 and 2016 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…