DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2016 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
PajeroModelXC70
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
168 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
136 HPPower163 HP
324 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
265/70 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4838 mm
1815 mmWidth1870 mm
1800-1805 mmHeight1604 mm
1900 KgWeight—
2800 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2016 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…